|
|
||
|
Pro Humans have a moral responsibility to bring back extinct species and use them to revitalize struggling ecosystems. De-extinction will invigorate conservationism by reshaping the relationship between humans and the natural world and developing new genetic tools to protect endangered species. |
Con De-extinction is morally problematic, expensive, and unrealistic. Resurrection science diverts resources from more pressing conservation needs while inuring the public to the ecological catastrophe of extinction. Experiments in de-extinction will cause animal suffering, and it will be impossible to provide habitat for resurrected species. |
Check out Issues & Controversies’ unbiased coverage. You'll find “By the Numbers” data, primary sources, court cases, audio and video content, infographics, editorials, and newsfeed that are linked to the article.
Go to the full article in Issues & Controversies. Must be on campus or login with with COM ID off campus. Learn more about Issues & Controversies. See all our Controversial Issues news.
© 2024 COM Library
1200 Amburn Road, Texas City, Texas 77591
409-933-8448 . FAX 409-933-8030
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
0 Comments.